The question of where you draw the line between efficiency and fairness is indeed very difficult. I think you'll agree that the devil is in the details. So it's the question of what the details tell you about how you deal with the exception. The problem in refugee determination so often is when the exception becomes the rule, it becomes the means whereby what I would call non-genuine claimants stay for a long period of time. So you have to have this balancing act.
Yes, it requires of the government a considerable amount of subtlety to try to identify those categories where you want to pay the attention, because I do not know of a government of the kind that worked in my organization in Geneva and so on that did not take its signatory obligations seriously. But at the same time, it took its obligations to protect its borders seriously. So this constant balancing took place. I think it can be done, but do I think it will end arguments about where that line is? No, and I don't think it should either.