I do not profess to be an expert on the new system. I know a fair bit about systems overall, but I have not spent time looking in detail at this. As I understand the safe country of origin proposal, it would still allow a full hearing, as for any other person. The only difference is the appeal. That is the only difference. Therefore, the situation for persons who come from safe countries of origin remains as it exists at the present time, because there is no appeal for anyone right now. So that is a trade-off. If you have confidence that your first level decision-making is good, if you have that confidence.... If I may say so, you can argue individual cases; you always can in this business. As a general rule, the very fact that we have the highest approval rate in the world suggests to me that by international standards we do. I think what's very important are the criteria that are used and adopted when it comes to--
On May 25th, 2010. See this statement in context.