I'd be happy to answer that question.
I think we're talking, to a certain extent, to cross-purposes. You're currently talking about classes of people and a positive bias in favour of human rights protections for certain groups of people. Our concern is more on geographic territory, taking a part of a country and suggesting that part of that country would be safe. For us that would be problematic because it would require the individual to move within a country that nonetheless may or not be able to provide them with state-based protection.