That's what I was suggesting. The PIF has served us well over the last 21 years. The PIF is the anchor document put before the board, which contains the claimant's history of persecution. That PIF is composed in the tranquility of the lawyer's office. It's a calm, civilized way of putting together, in a chronological order, the refugee claimant's history. What we're proposing to replace it with is this interview by someone who's meeting the claimant for the first time, and I can tell you, the story is going to come out in a jumbled and scrambled way, with no head or tail. There's not going to be any anchored document before the board. There are going to be omissions in the story. It's just a bad idea.
On May 25th, 2010. See this statement in context.