One of the other components of this is the issue--and it's been stated--that there's a separation between the additional 2,500 refugees we would like to add to our numbers. In fact, part of moving forward on this is to get at those additional 2,500 refugees per year. I'd like to get your comments on that, because there's a perception on the one hand that yes, it's a very good thing to do, but you seem to be tying it to the bill, so why not do it anyway?
Is this really a wrong time to introduce a change that would actually see an additional 2,500 refugees come to this country each and every year?