So, I will continue. I simply made a comment and I would now like to get back to the subject at hand, the issue of designated countries.
If I understand your presentation correctly, you are against the fact that individuals would be denied the right to appeal for any number of reasons, in the end. During the committee's consultations, again today there were some proposals for a mix, alternatives and various solutions, as esoteric as they may be.
Essentially your position is based on the principle that to appeal is a right and all should have access to this right. Have I understood your position?