I would like to come back to the concept of designated countries, because that is really at the heart of our discussion. I know that it isn't easy for you to talk about that because you do not want to interfere in Canadian policy-making; that is a legitimate concern. However, we need to be better informed.
There are two things here: there is the idea of creating a list of countries that we believe are less likely to pose a risk, and then there is the way that list is used.
With regard to the creation of a list per se, i.e., its concept, you do not appear to find that problematic. Mr. Shelow has even explained that such a list might facilitate the processing and analysis of a claimant's file, by considering from the outset what distinguishes a claimant from his or her fellow citizens.
Nevertheless, concerning a specific aspect of this bill, i.e., taking away the right of appeal from these people, are you in favour of the fact that the claimants who come from those countries will lose their right of appeal?