I assure you, Mr. Shelow, I was perfectly aware of the fact that, by asking you the question, I was getting you to repeat what you had already said. I did that knowingly, because I wanted it to be very clear. Obviously, we will not throw stones at anyone. Everyone around the table is trying to say that... and the UN HCR agrees with you, everyone has a significantly different interpretation. So, I just wanted to ascertain your position.
We talked earlier about pre-removal risk assessments, an ultimate procedure that occurs during the last stage, immediately prior to removal. Under this new legislation, if it is adopted as is, unsuccessful refugee claimants will no longer be able to use that procedure.
And yet, you pointed out in your presentation that between the time when a final decision is made that a person is not found to be a genuine refugee claimant, and the removal, and a number of events can occur and lead to a change in circumstances.
Therefore, what kind of events are we talking about that could change a decision? And would you be in favour of a mechanism allowing a file to be re-opened on demand—and not automatically as in the case of an appeal—with the authorization of the commission, if it appeared that a situation had clearly changed?