My question more specifically has to do with the fact that there currently is an ipso facto appeal section. Someone appeals a decision, the appeal is granted. The case is reassessed.
Some organizations have suggested the establishment of a mechanism to reopen cases, not as a matter of right, but only if one can demonstrate that there has been a material change. Obviously, we would not want all those who have had their claims denied to request the reopening of their case.
Are you in favour of this idea of reconsidering the cases of individuals who bring some evidence that there has been a significant change in their country of origin or their personal situation?