Well, let me just ask, then, about your statement on a safe country of origin reducing abuse. How would it do that? Giving the refugees the fundamental right for an appeal, does that mean that they will then reduce abuse? I can't see the logic behind it. You are denying a person the right to appeal. How would that reduce abuse?
Because you reduce abuse by speeding up the program, speeding up the determination, and you make sure they get deported quickly. Having a right for appeal for them is fundamental. How would having that list help reduce abuse? This seems to be a complete leap of logic in that sentence, in that line of thinking.