No. The purpose of the meeting was so that we could all make sure, from an amendment perspective, if you're going to be submitting amendments, to at least understand those amendments as to what they're going to be, and not decide amongst ourselves whether they're going to be supported or not, but simply presented so that we understood them, so that the process of clause-by-clause would move forward in a constructive way, based on the fact that we want to try to move it in a manner that has all of us working together against that 11:59 deadline on June 3, versus anyone trying to take advantage of that deadline in a way that is not constructive.
Ms. Chow, if that's your understanding, I certainly want to make it clear that we're going to be presenting amendments. We'll look at amendments, but the purpose of the meeting is not to come to a consensus on amendments. It's to understand each other's amendments.