That's a bit beyond my competence.
The humanitarian and compassionate grounds feature is an extremely important safety feature in the system. The definition of a refugee is very narrow, and you get people from situations who really have very good grounds to fear for their lives but don't necessarily meet the definition. We should keep the H and C. If we do, fear needs to be included in it, because we do need to be able to save people. We don't need another Mexican woman getting shot after being turned down for a claim, even though there was fairly good evidence that she was in danger if she was returned. And then limiting access to it for people from safe countries, which I believe is in the bill, makes no sense at all because it's precisely the people coming from these presumably safe countries—