Where it seems to me we're basing this on the U.K. system, there is a problem. I have a lot of information.
One thing I found appalling in Bill C-11 was that there would be no opportunity to consider the best interests of refugee claimant children, which is required by the Convention on the Rights of the Child. There was a case where the IRB found three Mexican children who were orphaned because their parents were killed, and under the definition of refugee they were denied. If they were not given humanitarian or compassionate application or appeal, they would be returned to the scene of their parents.
It's very important to allow a better appeal process, with people who have good knowledge, qualified people, so we don't have to go through numerous appeals. In the case we described right now, they went through several appeals. Why not have a good decision in the beginning?
There are lots of criticisms.