If an appeal division or process is established, there is an assumption that errors could be committed, which could lead to serious consequences. The government's proposal excludes from the appeal process countries in which the circumstances are not exactly clear and where, in most cases, people do not appear to be persecuted. However, I find that slightly paradoxical.
For example, take the case of a gay or lesbian from Iran. Everyone could quickly arrive at the conclusion that there is an actual risk that the person is a victim of persecution. If he or she were from Poland, things would not be as clear.
Finally, the government is withdrawing the right of appeal in situations where things are less clear and where, in my view, the risk of error is greater. Do you share that analysis, i.e., that it is rather paradoxical to withdraw the right of appeal from people whose cases will be the most difficult to ascertain?