it is not a question. Without limiting the time allowed for questions, we could spend the first hour to study the government amendments--G-3, G-4, G-5 and the others that were recently submitted and that we did not have time to look at--and the second hour to study the transition provisions that were not really discussed during our meetings. I believe that the best procedure would be for us to get a brief presentation of those provisions. Then, we might ask questions which would be mostly technical. If we have no questions, we do not ask any and we do not start a political debate.
On June 1st, 2010. See this statement in context.