I know that I may be the first member to ask this question but I want to make sure that I understand the transition. So, I would put the question differently to you.
The Act as the government intends to amend it would include a number of provisions that would be favourable to the claimants, who would have more rights and more opportunities. This is basically related to the Refugee Appeals Division. On the other hand, some provisions would be unfavourable to claimants in that the possibility to appeal or to use additional procedures that existed in the past would be limited.
Are there any cases when a claimant would be forced to accept unfavourable provisions, that is to say provisions shutting down doors that were open previously, and doing that even before the claimant had access to a favourable decision, namely from the Refugee Appeals Division?