From what I understand, Mr. Coderre hasn't drafted a formal amendment and, before introducing one, he wants to know what the other members think. For my part, I think that what is on the table is reliable enough for us to be able to include it in the bill. Obviously, if there are future problems, Parliament can always make amendments to it. These are mechanisms that exist elsewhere in the world. What is more, the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees has said that this acceleration on the basis of the concept of designated countries was highly acceptable.
I would also like to emphasize that, even though, in principle, it is definitely possible to include a review provision for a single clause, it seems to me that, in the context of a reform in which we make a whole series of amendments in order to produce a coherent whole, we could find ourselves in a situation in which one element would be missing or a number of offsetting elements would disappear. In short, I'm reluctant to have a review provision that applies to this provision.