This committee quite a few months ago said we preferred at that time, when we finished the study, that it be an arm's-length corporation, like the Canadian Bar Association and engineers' society. The bill recommended something else, and I'm not necessarily opposed to it at all. The body you've recommended is basically still under the federal government. It's under the department minister, and you would have ultimately the power to oversee how this body would function. There are two different options. Well, the third option is of course government regulations. That's not being considered.
Can you go into some detail as to why you chose this route and not the route we were looking at? Is it primarily because you think this industry is not quite ready to completely, 100%, do the self-regulation, that there is a process in order for the industry to get to a stage it could regulate itself? Can you explain a bit about the philosophy?