Well, the legislation isn't designed to solve all of the problems. It goes a major step along the way toward what individuals are allowed to do if they're in Canada in terms of immigration procedures and practices.
With regard to the regulation, you can have a perfectly designed system; it's how it's implemented. In the first seven or eight things you indicated, about education, accreditation, exams and standards, CSIC has done many of those. I would simply say that the difference in what we feel, as members, is that they've been done in a way not to maximize the effectiveness or the efficiency of the organization, but to maximize the revenues. So it costs us a lot of money to belong and to stay, and that has an impact on the number of members CSIC has removed. Of those members—you heard about the numbers removed—the vast majority were removed because they couldn't afford to pay the fees.
A lot of the individuals who graduate from schools are there to set up their own businesses. Immigration practitioners, on the whole, operate alone. They all come out and they're all operating on somebody else's dime, mostly. Perhaps they have a little capital saved up, and they start their businesses and find out it's not easy.
I was in the corporate world for 40 years, so getting business is the hardest thing you have to do. But when you end up in a situation where your business is developing slowly, and then you get hit with fees and more fees, ultimately you say “Maybe I'm in the wrong business, but I really like this.” We believe a whole lot of them have decided they can actually stay in this business without paying the fees.