I wanted to refer to that, because the report the committee did in 2008 talks about all the issues CSIC faced: the membership fees were too high, the exam was prepared and marked in a questionable way, CSIC failed to develop an industry plan, the board of directors was not accountable to anyone, there was no possibility for CSIC members to call a special meeting of the society, and so on. These were the things the committee heard across the country.
In the report presented by the Canadian Migration Institute, one of the things Imran commented on was that just two months ago they commissioned a survey to determine how CSIC fellows feel about the regulations. The results clearly indicated that the fellows think CSIC is an effective regulator.
You're a member of CSIC. You also have membership. So I guess I'm asking a two-part question. What does your membership think of the current setup?