However, I feel that the advantage of including the provisions in the act has to do with independence. The organization would exist and would be shielded from political pressures of any kind, since its existence would be sanctioned by the act. For the organization's structure to be modified, Parliament would have to get involved. In terms of regulations, the minister can act directly. However, the minister would have the flexibility to make changes quickly if a problem arises.
How would you solve this dilemma? My understanding is that you feel that we should do a test run with an organization set up under the regulations, and later, if it goes well, to designate that organization formally pursuant to the act. Is that what you're saying?