You explained the evidence that had to be provided under the current legislation to show that someone was exercising the profession illegally. That's fine.
Let us suppose now that the committee decides that it would be an offence even to present oneself as a consultant or to give the impression that one is an immigration consultant, which is the case under the legislation in place in Quebec and the other provinces.
Would it be easier to prove that someone presented himself as a consultant through a business card or an advertisement, rather than having to prove what is required under the current legislation? In your work, would it be easier to provide that evidence in court?