Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Mr. Kriek, on page 7 of your submission, you list categories (a) to (f) that are acceptable and legal for a recruiter to do work in. Then you make your argumentation after you list these off.
I note that (a), (b), (d), (e), and (f) quite directly involve themselves with the Immigration Act, etc., but (c) is strictly a submission of a request for a labour market opinion pursuant to the immigration regulations. Perhaps someone could do a labour market opinion without actually being engaged on a case file. Would you consider that this one perhaps shouldn't necessarily be lumped together with the rest of the ones you've listed off in (a) to (f)?