Thank you.
Just out of curiosity, it appears that.... It's quite clear and you've actually said it in your conclusion: “History in Canada and abroad has shown self-regulation for consultants to be a failure”. That's an unequivocal statement.
You gave the example of Australia.
It appears that choice number one was to use lawyers and paralegals that you actually would oversee. Choice number two would have been a statutory body.
This is choice number three. The way it's currently written and presented to us, what would you say its chances are of success?