I'd just comment specifically in an immigration context. This is the very problem that happened in Australia. Australia was the model for our model; we modelled our system after Australia. Theirs turned out to be a failure. They started theirs in about 1998-99. They had one organization, the MIA, the Migration Institute of Australia, doing both functions.
It proved to be a failure. The resolution in Australia was that the government took over the regulatory function and created their own regulatory body, because there's a conflict between promoting the interest of your members and trying to protect the public interest. It's just one of those inherent structural problems that exist with the current organization.
In our submission of July 2, which should be read as a companion to this submission, we said that this has to be looked at. Whoever is going to take over this role in the future, even if it's CSIC, they can't continue to be the representative body and the regulatory body.