Thank you.
Thank you, Minister.
One of the aspects that's been brought up by the CBA this afternoon, and also obviously by the opposition in terms of the perspective on a statutory body, is the example of what happened in Australia.
I think it needs to be clarified, though, that the mistake the Australian government acknowledges they made—and it's clear in the report that the CBA submitted today—is that the Australian government did not actually maintain control of the regulatory body; they in fact made it independent. It's pretty significant--and it hasn't been brought up here--that upon review of the decision they made, it was obvious that the ministry and the government should have maintained control of the regulatory body.
I'm wondering if you can you describe a little more clearly how that control is going to be maintained by the ministry and by the minister.