No, I have a minor change. Just a second.
I'm just going to move a slight wording change.
I'm going to read the entire thing:
Every entity that is authorized to offer or provide services to assist persons with applications in accordance with subsection (4) is prohibited from providing substantive immigration advice or referring persons
etc.
I'm adding one extra word, “substantive”.
In Beijing, New Delhi, and Mexico City, an Indian company operates a service on behalf of CIC. They process visitor visas or temporary residence visas. The intention here is to make sure they do not give substantive advice. They assist in putting in the application, so it would put them in a conflict situation. We also want to make sure they do not refer people to a certain immigration consultant, because that is a direct conflict.
This is the recommendation in there. I know they don't have the intention to do so, but they could. This point was raised by a few of the witnesses, and they're worried about it. This would clarify it and make sure.... Advice is fine, but not substantive advice, as you're getting into IRPA.