—and that we could fold the government's into this.
My question doesn't at all imply that I don't support the ruling. I do support that ruling. It's really about the ruling on the original amendment, which has now been conflated legally into this one.
But I just want it to be clarified that the legislative clerk has indeed examined this issue. If he hasn't, he may want to take the time to do that, because it's been raised here, and I know that things fly through very quickly. I want to make sure he has really examined the amendment to ensure that the government's concern is not valid, because if the government's concern is valid, it's my concern too. That is my concern, because it would mean that we have amended the bill beyond the scope of the legislation. But quite possibly they're wrong. It's happened once before, I'm sure.