I have two questions, Mr. Chairman.
It seems to me that the Committee had unanimously consented, at the beginning of this process, to the idea of members being able to express their views twice on the same lines, if the subjects were different—simply to facilitate our work. In my opinion, that consensus is still in place.
Furthermore, this amendment is similar to amendment LIB-1, which is based on the same philosophy, even though it's a little different. I would like to know whether this amendment will be dealt with later, or whether we should deal with them together.