Agreed, but I'd like to make a small comment just on the intent and on this issue around that before we do--not one that's going to get in the way of anything. We as well agree with the intent of encouraging compliance and the utilization of registered and qualified consultants. But I would hope that when it is figured out how to word this into the regulations, proper care is put to make sure that it doesn't render people even more vulnerable. You know, if they're told by a crooked consultant--who's not going to be compliant on all sorts of levels--to lie on their application and not say they're using that crooked consultant, that it then doesn't bounce back as something that's going to further penalize people who are in a vulnerable position.
I know there are ways around that and the intent is not there, but I just wanted to highlight that particular issue. I'm willing to grant unanimous consent to withdraw.
(Amendment withdrawn)