Well, the genesis of my view is not in the type of employment, but that we, as a country, need them abroad. I think there's a distinction. It's not just the employment contract. It's not whether you work for the government or not. Anybody that is going away on behalf of the government has to work for the government. But that is simply coincidental; the fact is that we are sending them abroad. Then, on the other hand, there is a choice people make, and I'm not saying that you shouldn't really....
I think the other argument I'm making is that you don't have to compare the two and see them as equals. They aren't. You have a way of bringing private individuals into equality to whom the children are born abroad. Within the first 25 or 30 years of the child's life, if the child comes here to live for three years, the child would have the same rights as if the child were born in Canada. By the argument I've accepted from the advocates, where I came to Canada and after a certain number of years I now have full rights as a Canadian, a child born to private individuals abroad should be able to do the same.