I would just like to ask one very simple question. The problem, the hesitation, seems to come from the fact that we do not want to set a precedent by negotiating an agreement with AQPP, even though four precedents already exist. Can you understand how, from the outside, it seems a little curious that you prefer to negotiate with 300 separate owners and come to 300 separate agreements when you could have one agreement with AQPP that would include everyone? It might be seen as a kind of divide and conquer approach.
On February 3rd, 2011. See this statement in context.