I think the concern raised by Mr. Oliphant is also everyone else's concern, including that of pharmacists. It is a question of ensuring that refugees have access to their medication. As I said, that is why I wanted the committee to tackle this issue right away. My colleagues agreed.
I would like to go back to Mr. Dykstra's question on whether there were other examples. It seems to me that the agreement you want is exactly the same as the agreement the federal government has with other organizations, including the RCMP, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the aboriginals and a fourth group whose name I did not have time to jot down. So these are federal departments, government agencies, that negotiate directly with a private organization, though it may be a public issue. But perhaps the word “negotiation” is not actually appropriate because you are telling me that it is not the list of drugs that are covered or the reimbursement rates that concern you. You simply want to know what is covered and reimbursed and how you are going to be reimbursed as pharmacists.
Is that so?