You're right. In an ideal world, we would have more points of service and more local information. What is difficult, however, is that, for a functional office, we need a sufficiently large critical mass. In a number of places, in Nairobi, for example, if we applied the rule that we should have a specific minimum number of officers, we would have five offices with one and a half officers each. It's very difficult to do that, of course. In many cases, we nevertheless keep two officers. Currently in Taiwan, we shouldn't have as many employees; there should be one or two fewer. However, we become less effective as soon as we fall below a certain threshold.
That's essentially the justification, the reason why we want to move certain administrative classes to Canada. That could also give us flexibility when there are sudden increases or decreases, as quite often happens.
For example, Sean noted that, over the years, Taiwan has had a constant decline in the number of applications. However, all it takes is for a few warships to arrive from continental China off the coast of Taipei for the number of applications to suddenly explode. We have previously seen that in the case of Taiwan.