Yes, but it's a de novo application. If you have 18 months to demonstrate that you've created a relationship, even I could create one. It doesn't mean that the initial decision that it wasn't a bona fide relationship was wrong. It simply means that 18 months after the initial decision, you've been able to create enough of a relationship. Either it's bona fide now, or maybe it wasn't then. However, it doesn't necessarily tie together that because you refused it once, and the IAD overturned it, that it is correct.
We've done a bit of an analysis of that. It didn't give us exactly what we needed, but we certainly could share the analysis with you to show you some of the complexities involved. One of the things we face is that we don't have all the resources we need to do all of the analysis. Of course, it doesn't serve much purpose to us to refuse a case that, in the end, is a bona fide case, because all we would be doing then is processing the case twice—albeit I'm not saying we never make a mistake.
I really want to clarify that an overturned decision at the IAD does not mean that the first decision was wrong.