Sure.
First of all, we agree with all the recommendations of the Auditor General. I want to make that clear. The Auditor General made recommendations in four areas. The first one is around helping visa officers abroad make admissibility decisions: giving them the right tools, making sure the information we give them, such as risk indicators about those specific countries, are up to date.
The second was in the area of the security screening process, where we work very, very closely with our partners in CSIS and the RCMP. The Auditor General had a number of recommendations whereby we should ensure that all the information that is available in those three organizations be mapped out, so we're sure we're using the universe of information that's available in order to make proper decisions.
The third area was around process, and this is around training of our officers, quality control, and service standards. So there were some recommendations around there.
And the fourth area was around governance and performance measurement, whereby the Auditor General wanted to make sure our agreements, our memoranda of understanding with the various organizations, were up to date, that we were governing the process properly, and that we had proper performance measurements in place. In other words, we were getting proper feedback from visa officers that the system was working for them, that they had the right information, that they were able to make proper admissibility decisions, and finally, that between our two organizations—CIC and CBSA—particularly, that we measured the performance of the overall system in terms of knowing we're meeting service standards and this sort of thing.
We've agreed with all the recommendations. Most of the recommendations will be addressed this year. I could go into the details in terms of what we're doing.