Okay, thank you.
Thank you to our guests for the second hour. My questions are actually directed at the officials from the Auditor General's office.
The purpose of the report itself is to make recommendations and uncover certain areas that need improvement. One of the things that was in that report, and I believe this is a quote, was unsatisfactory progress on commitments in response to the 2006 recommendations, in particular in the areas of governance and project business case.
What I am talking about in this particular case is GCMS and the biometrics projects. In that report GCMS was rated unsatisfactory, whereas the biometrics project was rated satisfactory.
I'm wondering if you can give me specific examples of what is lacking in both of those systems, in particular why one was rated satisfactory and the other one was obviously not.