What could be similar, which was cut off a few years ago, was that fiancées were considered members of the family class, and they were able to be sponsored to Canada, on the proviso that within a certain period of time they must marry the person who sponsored them to Canada. If they failed to do that, they would be removed from Canada.
The only difficulty was that upon coming to Canada, the fiancée was conditionally landed and had all the benefits of the courts and legal process and could say, “I don't like the way he parts his hair”—or whatever it was—“so I'm not going to marry him.” That's where the problem came in. But I raise that by way of the fact that if you issue the conditional landing, regardless of the family background—whether it's a marriage of convenience or a marriage that was contracted, and today some people even get married by telephone under some religions—you would therefore allow the spouse to come to Canada on condition that the immigration department would be satisfied that the people are still cohabiting. Then you could interview both of them, as opposed to doing an interview of a spouse overseas and asking, “Do you intend to live with your spouse in Canada?” This way you could say, “Okay, where do you live? Do you live together?”