I follow you, sir. You're a great writer.
I found it fascinating. One part of your article was about how vigorously we probe through questions on personal, legal, medical, and family matters, as well as those on financial histories, in such intimate ways it would make a proctologist blush. I found that kind of humourous, and I got your point very quickly and succinctly.
“But”, you said, “nowhere do we ask them about their value systems and their beliefs.” I've been listening to what you've been saying today, and I think you made that comment based on your experience and the work you did as an officer, and also, obviously, on the work you're doing now. So I wonder if you could expand a little on that to say why we should...because obviously the difficult part of all the interview process is trying to get face to face.
You bring up a very intriguing alternative to the face-to-face interview, and that is to get into the questioning of values and beliefs. I wonder if you could expand on what you mean by that and how we would possibly...because I do think, whether it's agreed or not, it certainly would allow for a further undertaking and understanding of security.