Okay. I have your list, in your notes, of what you think we should....
I want to shift gears a bit to something else that I don't think you've talked about as much, and that's the immigration test of denying entry to someone who may cause excessive demands on Canada's health or social services system.
I notice that you actually say—this is from page 6 of your slides—that our system, through our testing, may actually be creating the circumstances by which we're placing an excessive demand; it's not the actual condition itself.
There was a relatively famous case in the last year about a family in New Brunswick whose child had autism, and the immigration system determined that would present an excessive demand on our medical system.
Do you feel that the medical community and doctors are being consulted well enough by CIC before that decision is made to deny someone entry into Canada?