Essentially, we need to be very careful that we don't share systematic information that could pose a problem to specific individuals, such as in the case you've cited.
When we do collect the biometrics we will be looking to share, as we said, about the criminal history and previous immigration history in Canada, and with trusted partners.
I think what's going to be important about the sharing with partners is to understand that it's not going to be that holus-bolus all information on a file will be pushed out proactively, systematically, to our partners, but where we are sharing the fingerprint, for example, if there's a match then at that point it would trigger a case-by-case conversation with the partner to ensure that we were getting only the relevant information that would be material to a decision that we would make for immigration or law enforcement purposes. So we wouldn't say in the first instance—and bear with me—say Joe Bloggs' date of birth XYZ coming from country Z with these fingerprints. We would send the fingerprints, and if there's a match we would go back and say what sort of adverse information do you have without actually moving beyond into more detailed information.