Again, I would echo what Ezat said and support what you're saying, that we're often presented with the false dichotomy of saving money or being compassionate. I don't believe it's an either/or. Governments have to make tough decisions, and I think this bill is actually an example of making proper tough decisions.
Your question was how we can preserve due process but also ensure that we're getting value for money for taxpayers. I think this bill does that with the designated country provisions for countries that we know are not gross human violators. We know that countries within the EU are not in the same category as Cameroon. Any statement to the contrary would be pure political posturing. We don't need endless appeal processes for people coming from advanced western democracies. So I think that's one of the most important parts of the bill.
We will continue to have appeal processes for people coming from Cameroon, as an example, but it's a different category from the EU.