I'll do so with pleasure.
It not only might be challenged, it will be challenged. We are very careful when we say something is against the charter. You will notice the language in our submissions most of the time says “possibly against the Charter” because we were trying to be, shall we say, conservative in our submissions, as we're speaking for the Quebec Bar.
When it comes to the one-year warrantless mandatory detention, the Quebec Bar, like other legal experts, agrees not that it might be unconstitutional but that it is unconstitutional. Why do we go so far? It is because the Supreme Court has made that decision in the Charkaoui case in 2006. It's in black and white.
I note that the Canadian Bar Association and the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers quoted from that judgment. There is no doubt that one-year mandatory detention without judicial access is an infringement of international law and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.