The problem actually has to do with this bill's lack of criteria and its punitive aspect. The only criterion is the mode of arrival. People should not be detained on the basis of such a criterion. There is no link or logical connection between the detention and the reasons behind it.
In other provisions on detention, we see that, if a person is detained for trying to escape and that person poses a danger to the public or is suspected of having ties to a terrorist group, the case has to do with national security and the protection of the public. If the system had that kind of criteria, and an independent entity decided that the person in question posed a danger and should be detained, things would be different. However, if a year of detention is imposed based simply on the way the person arrived, there is no connection between the detention and the criteria. The only aspect involved is punitive.