The first system is the current system. I have many criticisms of our current detention system, but it does have a regular detention review, which is an absolutely basic judicial oversight. People are detained for reasons that are at least relevant, either for identity, security risk, criminality, or flight risk. Under Bill C-31, people would be detained for completely irrelevant reasons, essentially—for arriving in a group with false documents, or for administrative convenience because of a shortage of time. It's not going to get at security risks. It's certainly not going to get at the supposed bogus refugee issue, because that's not in the law, and in any case, it's not a reason for detention.
To stay with our current system would be our first alternative, and a very simple one, because people who are vulnerable can actually be released. That's extraordinarily important.