I certainly think that if we aren't clear about who someone is, detaining them is a reasonable measure. The problem I have is the way it's written now allows detention on mere suspicion of inadmissibility. The way it was worded is that you have to have “reasonable grounds to believe”, which doesn't mean beyond a reasonable doubt; it just means you have to have a reasonable ground to believe that this person may be inadmissible.
“Suspicion”, I think, is far too nebulous. Suspicion is not an objective standard. It's a completely subjective standard. And I would disagree with that. I think it's just a little bit too loose.