Yes. I mean, I just don't think it serves the objective. If the objective is to make the system faster, then we have to do it in such a way that people are treated with procedural fairness so that they can't then later make postponement requests, or go to the Federal Court and say that natural justice was denied and then get sent back and have to go through the whole thing again. It's not only expensive for claimants, but it's also going to clog up the court system.
You can imagine how many different postponement requests there will be, and not all of them will be granted. Then we're just shifting the burden away from the refugee board onto the Federal Court, which is still a taxpayer expense; it's just moving the problem.