Thank you, Mr. Opitz.
I want to pursue the issue of detention. If looks as if you've based your argument pretty much on your view that detention is unconstitutional and therefore problematic with respect to the bill. Whether they are determined to be a refugee prior to coming to Canada or they come to Canada and are able to prove themselves to be refugees, somewhere between 98% and 99% of them are not held in detention because we're able to determine who they are, what their backgrounds are, and therefore we are able to quickly determine whether they pose a threat to Canadians.
The half a percent of all refugees who come to Canada that you're speaking about are those who are filing to become refugees and are held in detention for a period of time until their documents prove who they are and that they are not a risk to society.
I'm not quite sure how you argue that if the individuals are unknown to the Canadian government or authorities or to the Canadian public, why it's unconstitutional to hold those individuals until we determine who they are. I don't know of any constitutional or charter challenge that has worked against the identification of an individual, saying that it is unconstitutional.