You have referred to the 1951 convention six or seven times as the basis of your fundamental argument on detention. You have made it very clear now that what wasn't taken into account in 1951 was an individual seeking asylum. What the 1951 convention takes into account is a refugee who has already been determined to be a refugee. So I don't think we have any argument with you on that issue.
The issue that we continue to harp on, for the less than 0.5% of those who seek refugee status here in Canada, is that if we do not know who the individual is, how can it be unconstitutional to hold that individual in detention until we've determined they are not a threat to Canadian society?
I don't need another long explanation, because both of us have used up Mr. Opitz's time, but what I'd like—