I think we have enough answer there.
I just want to speak for a moment to Ms. Morrissey and Ms. Jordan.
I can't remember who said it, but you referenced a particular case from Pakistan and the fact that they may not get a fair process, or whatever the case was that you were talking about. I just wanted to clarify that with regard to designation of safe countries there are certain qualitative and quantitative factors that are involved in the designation. The minister cannot just designate a country, it has to be based on stuff that is in legislation and also outlined....
I'm just going to give an example. Sixty per cent or more of total asylum claims from the country are withdrawn or abandoned by the claimants. The second one is that 75% or more of the total asylum claims from the country are rejected by the independent Immigration and Refugee Board. So when you're talking about cases like Pakistan, are people coming from Pakistan who are refugees abandoning their claims in droves like some other countries from the European Union? I'm just wondering if you were thinking this applied to that particular country.